Topic in. Complete SEO content brief out — search intent, keyword map, full H2/H3 outline, FAQ, internal linking ideas, and competitive angle. Built for SEO managers who'd rather brief writers than research for them.
Single input: a topic, a target audience, and an optional word count. Output: the brief below — pulled from real Top 10 search results and People Also Ask data, structured exactly the same way every time.
A senior SEO strategist spending 90 minutes per brief at £40-60/hr is the actual cost of doing this manually. At any meaningful publishing cadence, that hour math gets ugly fast:
The actual win isn't just the saved hours — it's that the strategist now spends their time on strategy, not research. Briefs get written that otherwise wouldn't, because the friction's gone.
Same engine, three deployment shapes — depending on whether you're a solo SEO, a content team, or an agency building this into a productised offer. Each tier builds on the last.
Briefs aren't built on the model's training data — they're built on what's actually ranking right now. Two live Serper searches feed real Top 10 + People Also Ask data into Claude alongside the topic and audience, which is why the output reads like an SEO strategist wrote it, not a chatbot.
[ Form: topic + audience + length ] │ ├──→ Serper: Top 10 results ──┐ └──→ Serper: People Also Ask ─┤ ↓ Claude Sonnet 4.5 ↓ Structured brief
Drop me a line with rough numbers — how many briefs a month, what CMS you publish into, where the friction sits — and I'll tell you honestly which tier makes sense and what it'd take to build.
hello@autom8ic.com →